|
編者按:教統局官員視特殊教育津貼為一般的工作相關津貼,意圖通過檢討之名而取消,可是,《特殊學校資助則例》附錄四B項清楚列明,有關津貼支付予已接受特殊教育專業訓練的同工,這算是一般的工作相關津貼嗎?過去,教育署發給接受此項津貼員工的公函,也明明白白的說這是因應同工接受專業訓練而支付津貼的,為甚麼教統局的官員,為了取消這項津貼,竟肆意曲解為純粹的工作相關津貼呢?
●《特殊學校資助則例》附錄四 B
項:
B. Special
Education Allowance
(a) A special education allowance may be awarded to CM/GM/APSM,
while serving in such capacity in a special school, who
are undergoing a recognized course of training in special education
run by the Hong Kong Institute of Education. The allowance
will be at a rate equivalent to one increment next on the Master
Pay Scale above the level of their substantive pay.
(b) A special
education allowance may be awarded to staff in the ranks of CM/AM/SAM/
PAM/GM/SGM/PGM/Pr II/PrI/ APSM/PSM/HM II/HM I, while serving in
such capacity in a special school, who
have successfully completed a recognized course of training in special
education run by the Hong Kong Institute of Education, or a course
recognized by the Director as an equivalent. The allowance
will be at a rate equivalent to two increments next on the Master
Pay Scale above the level of their substantive pay.
● 教育署署長給同工的公函中,說明因專業訓練而支付特殊教育津貼的一段:
|