爭辯甚麼？
爭辯的是政府有沒有引人犯罪？犯甚麼罪？犯了英國1996《教育法》1 第406和407條。要原汁原味，先看看條文。
406. -(1) The local education authority, governing body and head teacher shall forbid … (b) the promotion of partisan political views in the teaching of any subject in the school …
407. -(1) The local education authority, governing body and head teacher shall take such steps as are reasonably practicable to secure that where political issues are brought to the attention of pupils while they are -(a) in attendance at a maintained school, or (b) taking part in extra-curricular activities which are provided or organized for registered pupils at the school by or on behalf of the school, they are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views … …… 閱讀全文
從去年的反國教運動到最近就電視發牌要求政府解釋的事件，皆顯示爭取的道路並不易走。對於常額合約的問題，本會經過這幾年持續向教育局反映及力爭之下，終於成功推動教育局正視問題，以下為同工作出闡述。
在陌生的國度由零開始
高長泉老師 ( 任教嗇色園主辦可藝中學)
要在主流學校完成學業，文韜和家人的確要有移山搬石的決心。回想曾在街外被小孩取笑，但文韜能成熟面對，「沒所謂，因我不是傻的。」事實上，文韜努力訓練自己克服障礙，在校成績更是名列前茅。而且為了參與群體活動，他更鼓起勇氣上台，儘管表演完畢時，他害怕得要同學扶著下台，才艱難吐出「好驚」二字，但他還是成功挑戰自己，與同學同台演出。